Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a103/1a1032f1dfd06714b7350ef1b9a38b554f7326fa" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front"
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Later Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Revealed February 2019
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Panasonic FZ1000 II, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the FZ1000 II (20MP) is very close but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 II (1") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M5 III was manufactured 9 months later than the FZ1000 II and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M5 III grades vs the FZ1000 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-M5 III | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | ![]() | February 2019 | More recent by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus E-M5 III
FZ1000 II | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper display (+200k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-M5 III | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III enjoys physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 II has dimensions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") and a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III versus Panasonic FZ1000 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 III against the FZ1000 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21b78/21b784074c73c49b352fd7d15b4f609d911f2a32" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and FZ1000 II is 80 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4dec/c4dec9ba82cc2e233ea82cf935451fcde4ef5eea" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The photograph here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and FZ1000 II.
To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-M5 III features the larger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The newer E-M5 III is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36d26/36d269d6a16224da1893b568c8ec0ec543e8103f" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64bc2/64bc2b2e3adbe7e30e1da6c0f58f4c337e6f391d" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2019-02-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lbs) | 808 grams (1.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 350 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $1,199 | $898 |