Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Revealed February 2019
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
Following is a extended review of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ1000 II, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ1000 II (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 II (1") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was unveiled 15 years before the FZ1000 II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-300 grades vs the FZ1000 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-300 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus E-300
FZ1000 II | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2019 | January 2005 | More modern by 171 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 134k | Clearer display (+1106k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-300 | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 II has dimensions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") having a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ1000 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 vs the FZ1000 II.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FZ1000 II is 67 and 55 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The picture here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and FZ1000 II.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will show greater detail having an extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2019-02-18 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
Display resolution | 134k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 808g (1.78 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $800 | $898 |