Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b3f2/9b3f2d6a50d2689c7f63c3c89a882f0e770aa80f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FX580 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FX580 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-300 was released 5 years prior to the FX580 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX580 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-300 matches up versus the FX580 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic FX580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FX580
E-300 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Olympus E-300
FX580 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 49 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX580
E-300 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic FX580 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-300 compared to the FX580.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/052c4/052c4679e4fb28b71b94f0ef727d36341b93184c" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FX580 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/214a2/214a216fd636b0a3316b9a29d7beb5ac0f986fa8" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The graphic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and FX580.
All in all, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FX580 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef5d1/ef5d125aeb9d37ad828cf4d307813fb9cba2ccfa" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ead1/8ead160cb9dfb5224ce6046f699800a2c0854928" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 134k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $800 | $499 |