Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97595/97595091e04b873f01a3fddd6303aaf9df4a4ff6" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-300 was released 7 years earlier than the FX78 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-300 scores versus the FX78 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FX78
E-300 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-300
FX78 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 73 months |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.7") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FX78
E-300 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 offers external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-300 against the FX78.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7551/d7551d6d7701f3b2e4bd7c6d8a0d8491282329f8" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and FX78 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b197/2b19752e5d8fac5ea519ca34218dba02f6bcae93" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The photograph below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and FX78.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FX78 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81208/812080372a1e1470d30a8435d75988f5fe8306b3" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0384a/0384ac6a82235a1516fafe97bf863f12e8d2ae64" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2011-01-25 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lb) | 142 gr (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $800 | $210 |