Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708ca/708ca63198576f0ffc46689e66eb690a812d18d4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front"
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ35, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-300 was unveiled 6 years before the FZ35 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-300 scores versus the FZ35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ35
E-300 | FZ35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-300
FZ35 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2010 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 66 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ35
E-300 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ35 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-300 versus the FZ35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91116/91116b3db9cc183b637dad11f6267933b7d3db5a" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FZ35 is 67 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1e0b/a1e0b8efc16643541748040072ba5b5830bb29ad" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FZ35.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FZ35 will offer more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c624/5c624724bd7805a66deaf65959c2a389f6fa24b5" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/327d7/327d70b17da32b1e22afb4c5ee8b489b03676cf5" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 397 grams (0.88 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $800 | $999 |