Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front
Portability
72
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Panasonic FZ35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
  • 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
  • Launched July 2010
  • Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview

Here is a thorough review of the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ35, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was unveiled 6 years before the FZ35 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-300 scores versus the FZ35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FZ35

 E-300 FZ35 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-300

 FZ35 E-300 
LaunchedJuly 2010January 2005Fresher by 66 months
Screen size2.7"1.8"Bigger screen (+0.9")
Screen resolution230k134kSharper screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ35

 E-300 FZ35 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FZ35 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-300 versus the FZ35.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FZ35 is 67 and 72 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and FZ35.

As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FZ35 will offer more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography info
Panasonic FZ35 Portrait photography info
48
focusing manually
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
41
focusing manually
comes with face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Panasonic FZ35 Street photography features
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Panasonic FZ35 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
34
long zoom range (27-486mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low fps (2.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FZ35 as a Travel photography camera
45
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
MP count low (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
52
has built in flash
rather wide (27mm)
very long reach (486mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FZ35 as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inch)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
missing Time Lapse recording
41
focusing manually
rather wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging details
Panasonic FZ35 Vlogging details
9
no video recording
26
rather wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FZ35
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 Lumix DMC-FZ38
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2005-01-10 2010-07-06
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 27-486mm (18.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-4.4
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 8.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 397 grams (0.88 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures))
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $800 $999