Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 front
Portability
81
Imaging
49
Features
57
Overall
52

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Panasonic GH1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 385g - 124 x 90 x 45mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Successor is Panasonic GH2
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 Overview

Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic GH1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and GH1 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-300 was launched 5 years before the GH1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic GH1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-300 matches up vs the GH1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic GH1

 E-300 GH1 

Reasons to pick Panasonic GH1 over the Olympus E-300

 GH1 E-300 
IntroducedJuly 2009January 2005More recent by 54 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kSharper display (+326k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic GH1

 E-300 GH1 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 offers physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Panasonic GH1 has specifications of 124mm x 90mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") having a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic GH1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 against the GH1.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and GH1 is 67 and 81 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and GH1.

Clearly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Panasonic GH1 to provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
Panasonic GH1 Portrait photography information
48
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (8MP)
59
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Panasonic GH1 Street photography highlights
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
72
fully articulated screen
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Panasonic GH1 Sports photography details
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
32
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery (320 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Panasonic GH1
45
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (8MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
58
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
missing Timelapse function
not so great battery (320 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Panasonic GH1
43
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inch)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse mode
55
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery (320 CIPA)
missing Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Panasonic GH1
9
lack of video recording
72
screen is selfie friendly
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have microphone jack
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic GH1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic GH1
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2005-01-10 2009-07-10
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine HD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 18.89 x 14.48mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 273.5mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 1.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 10.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 385 grams (0.85 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 124 x 90 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.6
DXO Low light score not tested 772
Other
Battery life - 320 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $800 $949