Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
95 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2015
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT30
Photography Glossary Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS30, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TS30 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TS30 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-300 was unveiled 11 years prior to the TS30 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic TS30 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the TS30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic TS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic TS30
| E-300 | TS30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS30 over the Olympus E-300
| TS30 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 | January 2005 | More recent by 121 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS30
| E-300 | TS30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 features outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic TS30 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 against the TS30.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TS30 is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The visual below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and TS30.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic TS30 will give you more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 |
| Also called | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FT30 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2015-01-06 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.8" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 134k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.3 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $800 | $180 |