Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
95 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2015
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT30
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS30, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TS30 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TS30 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was unveiled 11 years prior to the TS30 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic TS30 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the TS30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic TS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic TS30
| E-300 | TS30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS30 over the Olympus E-300
| TS30 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 | January 2005 | More recent by 121 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS30
| E-300 | TS30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 features outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic TS30 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic TS30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 against the TS30.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TS30 is 67 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The visual below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and TS30.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic TS30 will give you more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic TS30 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 |
| Also called | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-FT30 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2015-01-06 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.8" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 134k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.3 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 142 gr (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $800 | $180 |