Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS45
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Announced January 2015
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS40
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS50
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS45, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZS45 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZS45 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-300 was launched 11 years earlier than the ZS45 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS45 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-300 matches up against the ZS45 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic ZS45
E-300 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus E-300
ZS45 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2015 | January 2005 | Fresher by 121 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 134k | Sharper screen (+906k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS45
E-300 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS45 has proportions of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic ZS45 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-300 versus the ZS45.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ZS45 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The visual here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and ZS45.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic ZS45 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 134k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 249 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $800 | $300 |