Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f10a/6f10a47131c9d5756aa9d066ef058620213d1e35" alt="Pentax K-30 front Pentax K-30 front"
63 Imaging
57 Features
66 Overall
60
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Revealed October 2012
- Successor is Pentax K-50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-30, both Advanced DSLR cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and K-30 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and K-30 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-300 was announced 8 years earlier than the K-30 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-300 matches up versus the K-30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-30. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Pentax K-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax K-30
E-300 | K-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-30 over the Olympus E-300
K-30 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 94 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+787k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-30
E-300 | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Pentax K-30 has sizing of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") with a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 versus the K-30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65b38/65b386f5d3f14c0e8909d467c028ddb5ffa44a5e" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and K-30 is 67 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9b40/e9b40f77c7fd8b237ab793c424d29b65bef9ff4b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and K-30.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Pentax K-30 will produce greater detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28492/28492872951f0128dcc3927d79225006ad5a87cc" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f8fa/4f8fa5521a1736f8b8a06e2cd3f3acc1839adc86" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-30 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-30 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2012-10-29 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Prime M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 45 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye,Slow Sync, Slow Sync+ Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 650g (1.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $800 | $525 |