Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
69 Imaging
63 Features
70 Overall
65
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 558g - 121 x 93 x 70mm
- Launched August 2014
- Newer Model is Pentax K-S2
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and K-S1 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and K-S1 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was launched 10 years earlier than the K-S1 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-300 matches up vs the K-S1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-S1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Pentax K-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax K-S1
| E-300 | K-S1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S1 over the Olympus E-300
| K-S1 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2014 |  | January 2005 | More modern by 117 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 134k | Sharper display (+787k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-S1
| E-300 | K-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 offers external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Pentax K-S1 has dimensions of 121mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") along with a weight of 558 grams (1.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 versus the K-S1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and K-S1 is 67 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The picture below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and K-S1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Pentax K-S1 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-S1 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-S1 |
| Other name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2014-08-27 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Prime MII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 51200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Available lenses | 45 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 134k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.4 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto + redeye, on, on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lb) | 558 gr (1.23 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 121 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1061 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 410 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI109 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $800 | $339 |