Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2813a/2813afe340c3e203bd6902c7b27645af6433fc86" alt="Pentax K-r front Pentax K-r front"
67 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 598g - 125 x 97 x 68mm
- Revealed March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax K-r, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and K-r (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and K-r (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-300 was announced 7 years earlier than the K-r which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax K-r being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-300 matches up vs the K-r in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-r. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Pentax K-r Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax K-r
E-300 | K-r |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-r over the Olympus E-300
K-r | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2011 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 75 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+787k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax K-r
E-300 | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-r has specifications of 125mm x 97mm x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") having a weight of 598 grams (1.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax K-r in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 and the K-r.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ace2/6ace25761dd5c19d78968dfae5a12a7f86efa5f6" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and K-r is 67 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0970/a0970ae7bbd9098c820d1e568b6a32732aa59423" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The image here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and K-r.
Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Pentax K-r will provide you with extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6805/f68051c37b408f282ee60b0e0449d592d62246e5" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c363a/c363aadb4a4299edd7f63a68c43c134d3c205194" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K-r Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-r | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Pentax K-r |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2011-03-11 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Prime II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 45 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync, High-Speed Sync and Wireless Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 598g (1.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 125 x 97 x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 755 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $800 | $1,100 |