Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
31
Overall
34

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Pentax WG-1 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview

The following is a complete review of the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and WG-1 GPS (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-300 was brought out 7 years before the WG-1 GPS which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-300 scores against the WG-1 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS

 E-300 WG-1 GPS 

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-300

 WG-1 GPS E-300 
LaunchedAugust 2011January 2005Newer by 80 months
Display dimensions2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kClearer display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-1 GPS

 E-300 WG-1 GPS 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 comes with outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 GPS has specifications of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 versus Pentax WG-1 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 compared to the WG-1 GPS.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and WG-1 GPS is 67 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and WG-1 GPS.

Clearly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Pentax WG-1 GPS will give greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography factors
Pentax WG-1 GPS Portrait photography factors
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (8MP)
35
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Pentax WG-1 GPS as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
54
weather proof
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography advice
Pentax WG-1 GPS Sports photography advice
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
37
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography highlights
Pentax WG-1 GPS Travel photography highlights
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
71
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Pentax WG-1 GPS Landscape photography features
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (1.8")
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
42
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
weather proof
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging info
Pentax WG-1 GPS Vlogging info
9
can't shoot video
25
really wide (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
 Olympus E-300Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS
General Information
Make Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus E-300 Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS
Also called as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Introduced 2005-01-10 2011-08-16
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8" 2.7"
Screen resolution 134k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 3.90 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 167 grams (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $800 $350