Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
93 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 180g - 98 x 57 x 31mm
- Introduced June 2011
- Replacement is Pentax Q10
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-300 and Pentax Q, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and Q (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and Q (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-300 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the Q and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax Q being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-300 scores vs the Q when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Pentax Q. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax Q Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax Q
| E-300 | Q |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q over the Olympus E-300
| Q | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2011 | January 2005 | Fresher by 78 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Clearer display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax Q
| E-300 | Q | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q has dimensions of 98mm x 57mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 and Pentax Q in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 versus the Q.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and Q is 67 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and Q.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Pentax Q will produce greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Pentax Q | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Pentax Q |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2011-06-23 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
| Total lenses | 45 | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 98 x 57 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 47 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 189 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $800 | $695 |