Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
93 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 180g - 98 x 57 x 31mm
- Introduced June 2011
- Replacement is Pentax Q10
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-300 and Pentax Q, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and Q (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and Q (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-300 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the Q and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax Q being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-300 scores vs the Q when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Pentax Q. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Pentax Q Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax Q
| E-300 | Q |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q over the Olympus E-300
| Q | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2011 | January 2005 | Fresher by 78 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Clearer display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax Q
| E-300 | Q | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q has dimensions of 98mm x 57mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 and Pentax Q in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 versus the Q.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and Q is 67 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and Q.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Pentax Q will produce greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax Q Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Pentax Q | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Pentax Q |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2011-06-23 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
| Total lenses | 45 | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 98 x 57 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 47 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 189 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $800 | $695 |