Olympus E-300 vs Samsung GX-1L
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-300 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung GX-1L, both Advanced DSLR cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and GX-1L (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was released 13 months prior to the GX-1L making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 matches up versus the GX-1L when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-300 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Samsung GX-1L. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung GX-1L
| E-300 | GX-1L |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Olympus E-300
| GX-1L | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2006 | January 2005 | More recent by 13 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.5" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
| Display resolution | 210k | 134k | Sharper display (+76k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung GX-1L
| E-300 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 features physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1L has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung GX-1L in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-300 compared to the GX-1L.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and GX-1L is 67 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and GX-1L.
Clearly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-300 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2006-02-24 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 6MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 134k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 570 grams (1.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $800 | $0 |