Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung NX3000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
63
Features
62
Overall
62

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
  • Launched May 2014
  • Succeeded the Samsung NX2000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX3000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NX3000 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-300 was announced 10 years earlier than the NX3000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-300 grades against the NX3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung NX3000

 E-300 NX3000 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus E-300

 NX3000 E-300 
LaunchedMay 2014January 2005Fresher by 114 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution461k134kClearer display (+327k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX3000

 E-300 NX3000 
Manual focus More precise focus
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 versus the NX3000.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and NX3000 is 67 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and NX3000.

All in all, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung NX3000 will deliver greater detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Portrait photography camera
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
does not have liveview
MP count low (8MP)
77
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography information
Samsung NX3000 Street photography information
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
81
screen tilts
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition (230g)
good high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography advice
Samsung NX3000 Sports photography advice
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
56
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography details
Samsung NX3000 Travel photography details
45
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
MP count low (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
68
lighter than competition (230 grams)
good resolution (20MP)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Landscape photography camera
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
no Timelapse function
72
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Samsung NX mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't record video
34
includes face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (230g)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
lack of external mic jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX3000
 Olympus E-300Samsung NX3000
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-300 Samsung NX3000
Also called EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2005-01-10 2014-05-26
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 35
Cross type focus points - 1
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Number of lenses 45 32
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 134k dot 461k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 230g (0.51 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 370 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - B740
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2-30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $800 $897