Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Launched May 2014
- Succeeded the Samsung NX2000
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX3000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NX3000 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-300 was announced 10 years earlier than the NX3000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-300 grades against the NX3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Samsung NX3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung NX3000
E-300 | NX3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus E-300
NX3000 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2014 | January 2005 | Fresher by 114 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 134k | Clearer display (+327k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX3000
E-300 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 versus the NX3000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and NX3000 is 67 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and NX3000.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung NX3000 will deliver greater detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Samsung NX3000 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2014-05-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 45 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $800 | $897 |