Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
98 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the ST30 (10MP) is very close but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ST30 (1/3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-300 was announced 7 years earlier than the ST30 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-300 scores vs the ST30 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Samsung ST30. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Samsung ST30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung ST30
| E-300 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Olympus E-300
| ST30 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | January 2005 | Fresher by 73 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Sharper display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung ST30
| E-300 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung ST30 has measurements of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 vs the ST30.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ST30 is 67 and 98 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The photograph below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and ST30.
All in all, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung ST30 will render extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Samsung ST30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Samsung ST30 |
| Alternative name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | - |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | () |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 134k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 87g (0.19 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $800 | $55 |