Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung ST30 front
Portability
98
Imaging
32
Features
18
Overall
26

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Samsung ST30
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Overview

Here is a in depth review of the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the ST30 (10MP) is very close but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ST30 (1/3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was announced 7 years earlier than the ST30 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-300 scores vs the ST30 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung ST30

 E-300 ST30 
Manual focus More accurate focus

Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Olympus E-300

 ST30 E-300 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2005Fresher by 73 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kSharper display (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung ST30

 E-300 ST30 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung ST30 has measurements of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 vs the ST30.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and ST30 is 67 and 98 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The photograph below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and ST30.

All in all, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung ST30 will render extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung ST30 as a Portrait photography camera
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
low resolution (8MP)
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Samsung ST30
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
54
lighter than competitors in class (87 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/3")
does not have RAW files
low max ISO (0)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Samsung ST30
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
16
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography highlights
Samsung ST30 Travel photography highlights
45
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
low resolution (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
65
lighter than competitors in class (87g)
built-in flash
great max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography info
Samsung ST30 Landscape photography info
43
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inch)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
no Timelapse recording
30
great max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/3")
low max ISO (0)
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST30 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
29
great max aperture (f)
lighter than competitors in class (87g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung ST30
 Olympus E-300Samsung ST30
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-300 Samsung ST30
Alternative name EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Introduced 2005-01-10 2011-01-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 4.8 x 3.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 17.3mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 -
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 -
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - ()
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 7.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 134k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480
Max video resolution None 640x480
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 87g (0.19 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) -
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $800 $55