Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung WB700 front
Portability
98
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Samsung WB700
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced December 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and WB700 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and WB700 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-300 was revealed 7 years earlier than the WB700 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-300 matches up vs the WB700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung WB700

 E-300 WB700 
Manual focus Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus E-300

 WB700 E-300 
AnnouncedDecember 2010January 2005More recent by 72 months
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution614k134kClearer display (+480k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung WB700

 E-300 WB700 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 features exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 and the WB700.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and WB700 is 67 and 98 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and WB700.

Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung WB700 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB700 as a Portrait photography camera
48
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low MP (8 megapixels)
29
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Samsung WB700 Street photography advice
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
49
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
max ISO too low (0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB700 Sports photography advice
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
28
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB700 Travel photography highlights
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
low MP (8 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
70
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fast maximum aperture (f)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB700 Landscape photography info
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (1.8 inch)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
37
fast maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Samsung WB700
9
lack of video recording
27
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung WB700
 Olympus E-300Samsung WB700
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-300 Samsung WB700
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2010-12-28
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 -
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 -
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - ()
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 134 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) -
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $800 $300