Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and WB700 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and WB700 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-300 was revealed 7 years earlier than the WB700 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-300 matches up vs the WB700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Samsung WB700. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung WB700
| E-300 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus E-300
| WB700 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2010 | January 2005 | More recent by 72 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 134k | Clearer display (+480k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung WB700
| E-300 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 features exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 and the WB700.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and WB700 is 67 and 98 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and WB700.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung WB700 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Samsung WB700 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2005-01-10 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | - |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | () |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 134 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $800 | $300 |