Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- New Model is Sigma SD10
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD9, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SD9 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-300 was revealed 2 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-300 scores versus the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Sigma SD9. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sigma SD9
E-300 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2005 | November 2002 | Fresher by 26 months | |
Display resolution | 134k | 130k | Crisper display (+4k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus E-300
SD9 | E-300 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD9
E-300 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 1.8" | 1.8" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-300 against the SD9.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and SD9 is 67 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and SD9.
All in all, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-300 will offer you more detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent E-300 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Sigma SD9 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Total lenses | 45 | 76 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 1.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | None |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 950g (2.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $800 | $3,001 |