Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sigma SD9 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Revealed November 2002
  • New Model is Sigma SD10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Overview

Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD9, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SD9 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was revealed 2 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).

Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-300 scores versus the SD9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sigma SD9

 E-300 SD9 
RevealedJanuary 2005November 2002Fresher by 26 months
Display resolution134k130kCrisper display (+4k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus E-300

 SD9 E-300 

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD9

 E-300 SD9 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension1.8"1.8"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-300 against the SD9.

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and SD9 is 67 and 54 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and SD9.

All in all, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-300 will offer you more detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent E-300 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD9 as a Portrait photography camera
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
47
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
low resolution sensor (3MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Sigma SD9 Street photography features
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
43
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (950g)
max ISO too low (400)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography advice
Sigma SD9 Sports photography advice
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
36
maximum shutter speed is high (1/6,000 seconds)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (3MP)
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Sigma SD9 Travel photography advice
45
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
MP count low (8MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
29
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (950g)
low resolution sensor (3MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Sigma SD9
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
missing Timelapse function
41
has manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (3MP)
max ISO too low (400)
no Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Sigma SD9
9
no video recording
9
can't shoot video
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-300 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sigma SD9
 Olympus E-300Sigma SD9
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus E-300 Sigma SD9
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2005-01-10 2002-11-26
Body design Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 3 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 2268 x 1512
Highest native ISO 400 400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Total lenses 45 76
Crop factor 2.1 1.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inches 1.8 inches
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 130 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/6000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 950g (2.09 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Compact Flash Type I or II
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $800 $3,001