Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
47
Features
51
Overall
48

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Sony HX350
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
  • Announced December 2016
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and HX350 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and HX350 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was unveiled 13 years before the HX350 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 grades against the HX350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony HX350

 E-300 HX350 

Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus E-300

 HX350 E-300 
AnnouncedDecember 2016January 2005Newer by 145 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution922k134kClearer screen (+788k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony HX350

 E-300 HX350 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony HX350 has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-300 and the HX350.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and HX350 is 67 and 62 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The image underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and HX350.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Sony HX350 will render more detail having an extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography highlights
Sony HX350 Portrait photography highlights
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
does not have liveview
low MP (8 megapixels)
48
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Sony HX350 Street photography features
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
50
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than competition in class (652 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography information
Sony HX350 Sports photography information
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
53
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography details
Sony HX350 Travel photography details
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
low MP (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
54
megapixel count good (20MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (652g)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Sony HX350 Landscape photography details
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
50
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Sony HX350 Vlogging highlights
9
no video shooting
27
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no mic jack
heavier than competition in class (652 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-300 vs Sony HX350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony HX350
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2005-01-10 2016-12-20
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 5184 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 202 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 8.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 pounds) 652 gr (1.44 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $800 -