Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 front
Portability
96
Imaging
43
Features
34
Overall
39

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Sony QX10
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1440 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 Overview

Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-300 versus Sony QX10, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and QX10 (18MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and QX10 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-300 was manufactured 9 years prior to the QX10 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.

Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-300 matches up against the QX10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony QX10

 E-300 QX10 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen dimension1.8""Bigger screen (+1.8")
Screen resolution134k0kCrisper screen (+134k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Olympus E-300

 QX10 E-300 
LaunchedSeptember 2013January 2005More modern by 105 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony QX10

 E-300 QX10 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony QX10 has proportions of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 versus Sony QX10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 vs the QX10.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and QX10 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and QX10.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony QX10 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography advice
Sony QX10 Portrait photography advice
48
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (8MP)
37
good megapixels (18 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Sony QX10 as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
68
image stabilization (Optical)
has touch to focus
lighter than competition in class (105g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography advice
Sony QX10 Sports photography advice
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
38
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (18MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Sony QX10 as a Travel photography camera
45
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition in class (105 grams)
has touch to focus
good megapixels (18MP)
quite wide (25mm)
very long zoom (250mm)
no Time Lapse recording
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Sony QX10 Landscape photography highlights
43
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inch)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
does not have Time Lapse mode
39
quite wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (18MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
small screen ( inches)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging information
Sony QX10 Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
34
quite wide (25mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (105g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1440 x 1080 pxls)
no mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony QX10
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10
Alternate name EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Lens-style
Announced 2005-01-10 2013-09-04
Body design Mid-size SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8" -
Display resolution 134k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - Depends on connected smartphone
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye None
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1440 x 1080 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1440x1080
Video format - MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 105 grams (0.23 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-BN,
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $800 $250