Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
45
Features
37
Overall
41

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Sony QX30
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
  • 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
  • Announced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 Overview

Following is a detailed review of the Olympus E-300 and Sony QX30, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Lens-style by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and QX30 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and QX30 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-300 was introduced 10 years before the QX30 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.

Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-300 scores versus the QX30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony QX30

 E-300 QX30 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen sizing1.8""Bigger screen (+1.8")
Screen resolution134k0kClearer screen (+134k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus E-300

 QX30 E-300 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014January 2005More modern by 117 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony QX30

 E-300 QX30 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony QX30 has dimensions of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 and Sony QX30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-300 compared to the QX30.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and QX30 is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and QX30.

Plainly, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sony QX30 will resolve extra detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Sony QX30
48
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
38
MP count decent (20MP)
features face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Sony QX30
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch focus
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography information
Sony QX30 Sports photography information
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
47
long zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (200 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Sony QX30 Travel photography info
45
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
65
boasts touch focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (720mm)
no Timelapse function
bad battery pack (200 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Sony QX30 Landscape photography highlights
43
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
missing Timelapse mode
39
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small ( inches)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
bad battery pack (200 per charge)
no Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
Sony QX30 Vlogging features
9
no video shooting
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony QX30
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30
Also called EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Lens-style
Revealed 2005-01-10 2014-09-03
Physical type Mid-size SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-720mm (30.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-6.3
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inches -
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dots 0 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye None
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 193 grams (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BN,
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots One One
Cost at release $800 $348