Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 front
Portability
58
Imaging
51
Features
76
Overall
61

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Sony RX10
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
  • 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
  • Launched March 2014
  • Newer Model is Sony RX10 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and RX10 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and RX10 (1") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was released 10 years before the RX10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-300 matches up vs the RX10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony RX10

 E-300 RX10 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Olympus E-300

 RX10 E-300 
LaunchedMarch 2014January 2005More recent by 111 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution1290k134kSharper display (+1156k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony RX10

 E-300 RX10 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony RX10 has proportions of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") having a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-300 against the RX10.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and RX10 is 67 and 58 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing specs. The visual below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and RX10.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony RX10 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography features
Sony RX10 Portrait photography features
48
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (8MP)
70
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Sony RX10 Street photography highlights
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
72
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
saves RAW files
weather sealing
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX10 as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
67
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
weather sealing
better than average battery (420 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Sony RX10 Travel photography advice
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
58
better than average battery (420 shots)
weather sealing
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Sony RX10 Landscape photography features
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (1.8 inch)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Timelapse function
63
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
saves RAW files
weather sealing
better than average battery (420 CIPA)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Sony RX10 Vlogging advice
9
no video
30
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes microphone socket
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony RX10
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Also called EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2005-01-10 2014-03-20
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 400 12800
Highest boosted ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Min boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-200mm (8.3x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 1.8 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 134k dots 1,290k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - WhiteMagic
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 10.20 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lbs) 813 grams (1.79 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 69
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.9
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 474
Other
Battery life - 420 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $800 $698