Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Announced March 2016
  • Old Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Sony RX10 III, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") use different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-300 was launched 12 years before the RX10 III which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-300 scores vs the RX10 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony RX10 III

 E-300 RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-300

 RX10 III E-300 
AnnouncedMarch 2016January 2005More modern by 136 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution1229k134kCrisper screen (+1095k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony RX10 III

 E-300 RX10 III 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 provides outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

See the Olympus E-300 versus Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 against the RX10 III.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and RX10 III is 67 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The picture below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and RX10 III.

As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony RX10 III will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 III
48
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
resolution not great (8MP)
71
focusing manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography information
Sony RX10 III Street photography information
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
64
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW files
environment sealing
more heavy than competitors in class (1,051 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography information
Sony RX10 III Sports photography information
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
70
amazing zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
good battery (420 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Sony RX10 III Travel photography info
45
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
55
good battery (420 shots)
environment sealing
good resolution (20MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (1,051 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography highlights
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
no Timelapse function
63
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW files
environment sealing
good battery (420 shots)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
does not have Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
Sony RX10 III Vlogging features
9
no video shooting
28
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external microphone jack
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competitors in class (1,051g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Also called EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2005-01-10 2016-03-29
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max boosted ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Min boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lbs) 1051 grams (2.32 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $800 $1,398