Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Released January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Sony S2000, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was launched 6 years prior to the S2000 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-300 grades vs the S2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony S2000

 E-300 S2000 
Manually focus More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-300

 S2000 E-300 
ReleasedJanuary 2010January 2005More modern by 60 months
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k134kCrisper screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony S2000

 E-300 S2000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-300 and Sony S2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-300 against the S2000.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and S2000 is 67 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and S2000.

As you can tell, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Sony S2000 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Sony S2000
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
46
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Sony S2000 Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
no liveview
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,200s)
slow fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography features
Sony S2000 Travel photography features
45
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
50
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Sony S2000 Landscape photography features
43
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (1.8")
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
27
nice screen size (3")
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging info
Sony S2000 Vlogging info
9
no video
21
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony S2000
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2010-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8" 3"
Display resolution 134k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 1s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1200s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.30 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lbs) 167 gr (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $800 $225