Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Sony S2000, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-300 was launched 6 years prior to the S2000 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-300 grades vs the S2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony S2000
E-300 | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-300
S2000 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | January 2005 | More modern by 60 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony S2000
E-300 | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 and Sony S2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-300 against the S2000.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and S2000 is 67 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and S2000.
As you can tell, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Sony S2000 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
Display resolution | 134k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $800 | $225 |