Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Launched February 2009
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Sony S950, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the S950 (10MP) is very well matched but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and S950 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was released 5 years prior to the S950 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S950 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-300 matches up against the S950 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony S950
E-300 | S950 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Olympus E-300
S950 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2009 | January 2005 | Newer by 49 months | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony S950
E-300 | S950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 provides external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony S950 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus E-300 versus Sony S950 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-300 vs the S950.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and S950 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and S950.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sony S950 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $800 | $130 |