Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Sony S950
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
  • Launched February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Overview

Below, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Sony S950, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the S950 (10MP) is very well matched but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and S950 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was released 5 years prior to the S950 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S950 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-300 matches up against the S950 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony S950

 E-300 S950 

Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Olympus E-300

 S950 E-300 
LaunchedFebruary 2009January 2005Newer by 49 months
Display dimension2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kClearer display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony S950

 E-300 S950 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 provides external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony S950 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

See the Olympus E-300 versus Sony S950 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-300 vs the S950.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and S950 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and S950.

To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sony S950 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography highlights
Sony S950 Portrait photography highlights
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low MP (8MP)
26
focusing manually
manual mode not available
no external flash support
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Sony S950 Street photography factors
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Sony S950 Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
24
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Sony S950 Travel photography advice
45
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low MP (8MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
50
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
low MP (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony S950 as a Landscape photography camera
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (1.8 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
31
focusing manually
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Sony S950 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
9
no video shooting
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Sony S950 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony S950
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950
Also called as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2009-02-17
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 33-132mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 167 grams (0.37 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $800 $130