Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX30
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
96 Imaging
43 Features
43 Overall
43
Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 141g - 96 x 59 x 15mm
- Released July 2013
Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX30 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-300 and Sony TX30, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TX30 (18MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TX30 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was unveiled 9 years before the TX30 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-300 scores vs the TX30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sony TX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony TX30
E-300 | TX30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX30 over the Olympus E-300
TX30 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2013 | January 2005 | Fresher by 103 months | |
Screen sizing | 3.3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 134k | Crisper screen (+1095k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony TX30
E-300 | TX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX30 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony TX30 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 and Sony TX30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-300 versus the TX30.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TX30 is 67 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The photograph below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and TX30.
Plainly, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony TX30 will provide greater detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sony TX30 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2013-07-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 141 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 96 x 59 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $800 | $230 |