Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Sony W330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 Overview

The following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-300 versus Sony W330, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and W330 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and W330 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was released 6 years before the W330 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W330 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 matches up against the W330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony W330

 E-300 W330 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Olympus E-300

 W330 E-300 
LaunchedJanuary 2010January 2005Newer by 60 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony W330

 E-300 W330 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 comes with exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony W330 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

See the Olympus E-300 versus Sony W330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 against the W330.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and W330 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The pic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and W330.

To sum up, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony W330 will show more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W330 as a Portrait photography camera
48
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography details
Sony W330 Street photography details
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Sony W330 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
26
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
slow fps (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Sony W330 Travel photography advice
45
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
65
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Sony W330
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
38
pretty wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W330 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
26
pretty wide (26mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony W330
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
Also called as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Released 2005-01-10 2010-01-07
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance - 4cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 1.8" 3"
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 128 grams (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $800 $170