Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and W380 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and W380 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was announced 6 years before the W380 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-300 grades against the W380 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sony W380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony W380
| E-300 | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W380 over the Olympus E-300
| W380 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | January 2005 | More modern by 60 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony W380
| E-300 | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony W380 has dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 versus the W380.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and W380 is 67 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The picture below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and W380.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony W380 will give greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W380 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 |
| Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 117g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $800 | $44 |