Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus E-500 front
Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-450
Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-510
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-500, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-330 (7MP) and the E-500 (8MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-330 was announced 5 months after the E-500 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).

Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-330 scores vs the E-500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-500

 E-330 E-500 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-330

 E-500 E-330 

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-500

 E-330 E-500 
AnnouncedMarch 2006October 2005Similar age
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Display dimensions2.5"2.5"Equal display sizing
Display resolution215k215kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 enjoys physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus E-500 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-330 vs the E-500.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and E-500 is 65 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The pic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and E-500.

All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus E-500 to resolve greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
54
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
48
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no liveview feature
MP count low (8MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography info
Olympus E-500 Street photography info
60
has a tilting screen
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average in class (616 grams)
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
56
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (479g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography factors
Olympus E-500 Sports photography factors
40
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (7MP)
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
Olympus E-500 Travel photography features
50
lighter than average in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (7MP)
display is not selfie friendly
52
lighter than competitors in class (479 grams)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-500 Landscape photography highlights
45
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (7MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Time Lapse recording
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Olympus E-500
9
lack of video recording
9
no video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-500
 Olympus E-330Olympus E-500
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus E-500
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 EVOLT E-500
Class Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2006-03-18 2005-10-21
Body design Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 8 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Peak resolution 3136 x 2352 3264 x 2448
Highest native ISO 400 400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 3
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 45
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of display 215 thousand dot 215 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.45x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 13.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 gr (1.36 pounds) 479 gr (1.06 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $1,100 $600