Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 III
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Announced March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-M10 III, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-330 was released 12 years before the E-M10 III which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-330 matches up against the E-M10 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-M10 III
E-330 | E-M10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-330
E-M10 III | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | March 2006 | More modern by 139 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 215k | Crisper display (+825k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-M10 III
E-330 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 has got exterior measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 III has dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-M10 III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-330 compared to the E-M10 III.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and E-M10 III is 65 and 80 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The image underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and E-M10 III.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M10 III to give more detail as a result of its extra 9MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2006-03-18 | 2017-08-31 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 8.6 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lb) | 410 gr (0.90 lb) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $1,100 | $650 |