Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Launched September 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-330 was introduced 6 years before the E-PL3 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-330 scores vs the E-PL3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 and Olympus PEN E-PL3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-PL3
E-330 | E-PL3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus E-330
E-PL3 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | ![]() | March 2006 | Fresher by 67 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-PL3
E-330 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL3 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-330 versus the E-PL3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d57c/1d57cca3e113517766ee8593302c52f483602a3e" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and E-PL3 is 65 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b3a9/7b3a991a8e46a4ec6659dc0bea8bbfcca5ab51f1" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The photograph below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and E-PL3.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus E-PL3 to show greater detail using its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2c1d/d2c1dbdf0ea2d7b811f1f0e9f938c93bd9f87415" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df22e/df22ecc29cabdd0840daf727192d50bdd60934cc" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2011-09-20 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Truepic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lb) | 313 grams (0.69 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $1,100 | $399 |