Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL8 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
76
Overall
62

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-450
Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL7
  • Later Model is Olympus E-PL9
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus E-PL8, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-PL8 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-330 was launched 11 years earlier than the E-PL8 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-330 scores vs the E-PL8 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-PL8

 E-330 E-PL8 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus E-330

 E-PL8 E-330 
ReleasedSeptember 2016March 2006Newer by 127 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1037k215kCrisper screen (+822k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-PL8

 E-330 E-PL8 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 has external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL8 has measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus E-PL8 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-330 compared to the E-PL8.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and E-PL8 is 65 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and E-PL8.

Clearly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus E-PL8 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-PL8 Portrait photography information
54
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
MP count low (7MP)
72
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography factors
Olympus E-PL8 Street photography factors
60
screen tilts up and down
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (616g)
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
84
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with focus by touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-PL8 as a Sports photography camera
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Olympus E-PL8
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
MP count low (7 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
comes with focus by touch
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-PL8 Landscape photography details
45
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
80
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PL8 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
35
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL8 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-PL8
 Olympus E-330Olympus PEN E-PL8
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-330 Olympus PEN E-PL8
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2006-03-18 2016-09-19
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 81
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 357g (0.79 pounds)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Retail price $1,100 $500