Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Announced March 2006
- Also Known as EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-330 was launched 8 years earlier than the E-PM2 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-330 grades against the E-PM2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-PM2
E-330 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-330
E-PM2 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2013 | ![]() | March 2006 | More modern by 87 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-PM2
E-330 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 has physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-330 vs the E-PM2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b67f/1b67f662b1a27a025c1522b9cc18cd52ed5a1967" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and E-PM2 is 65 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8339c/8339c6be96ae1d1489e3f82867fc5674bdbc3aaa" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The pic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and E-PM2.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus E-PM2 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb526/bb526cf07f97f0c478ae75360aafead22e223555" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2465/b2465a71c4fc4ab2bc13597f828bd59328d06e79" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2006-03-18 | 2013-05-21 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $1,100 | $448 |