Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus SP-620 UZ front
Portability
78
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-450
Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
  • 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
  • Launched January 2012
  • Earlier Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview

Below is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-620 UZ, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-330 was manufactured 6 years before the SP-620 UZ and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-330 scores versus the SP-620 UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ

 E-330 SP-620 UZ 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-330

 SP-620 UZ E-330 
LaunchedJanuary 2012March 2006More recent by 70 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kCrisper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-620 UZ

 E-330 SP-620 UZ 
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 has got external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-620 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-620 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-330 against the SP-620 UZ.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and SP-620 UZ is 65 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The graphic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and SP-620 UZ.

As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-330 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will offer you extra detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography info
Olympus SP-620 UZ Portrait photography info
54
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
34
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography info
Olympus SP-620 UZ Street photography info
60
tilting screen
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than others in class (616 grams)
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
50
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Olympus SP-620 UZ
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
48
excellent zoom range (25-525mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
Olympus SP-620 UZ Travel photography features
50
lighter than others in class (616g)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
61
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
great reach (525mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-620 UZ
45
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
no Time Lapse recording
41
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging factors
Olympus SP-620 UZ Vlogging factors
9
no video shooting
28
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
 Olympus E-330Olympus SP-620 UZ
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-330 Olympus SP-620 UZ
Also called EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2006-03-18 2012-01-10
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-525mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.1-5.8
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 6.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lbs) 435 grams (0.96 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $1,100 $199