Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus SP-810 UZ front
Portability
78
Imaging
37
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Announced March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
  • 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-810 UZ, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the SP-810 UZ and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-330 scores against the SP-810 UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ

 E-330 SP-810 UZ 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-330

 SP-810 UZ E-330 
ReleasedJuly 2011March 2006More recent by 65 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-810 UZ

 E-330 SP-810 UZ 
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 comes with physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-810 UZ has measurements of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

See the Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-810 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-330 versus the SP-810 UZ.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and SP-810 UZ is 65 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and SP-810 UZ.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus SP-810 UZ will offer you extra detail having an extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography features
Olympus SP-810 UZ Portrait photography features
54
focusing manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (7MP)
33
decent MP (14MP)
comes with face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography features
Olympus SP-810 UZ Street photography features
60
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
50
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography advice
Olympus SP-810 UZ Sports photography advice
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
40
long zoom range (24-864mm 36.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200s)
slow fps (0.7 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography details
Olympus SP-810 UZ Travel photography details
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (7 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
61
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (864mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography details
Olympus SP-810 UZ Landscape photography details
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (7MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Time Lapse recording
40
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging factors
Olympus SP-810 UZ Vlogging factors
9
no video recording
27
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone support
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
 Olympus E-330Olympus SP-810 UZ
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus SP-810 UZ
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2006-03-18 2011-07-27
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-864mm (36.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.9-5.7
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 1/4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1200 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 0.7 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 6.20 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 pounds) 413g (0.91 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $1,100 $280