Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus SZ-16 iHS front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Olympus SZ-16 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-330 was launched 7 years before the SZ-16 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-330 grades against the SZ-16 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS

 E-330 SZ-16 iHS 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-330

 SZ-16 iHS E-330 
IntroducedJanuary 2013March 2006More recent by 82 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kCrisper display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS

 E-330 SZ-16 iHS 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 features exterior measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has specifications of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-330 versus the SZ-16 iHS.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and SZ-16 iHS is 65 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and SZ-16 iHS.

As you have seen, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-330 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SZ-16 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
54
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low MP (7 megapixels)
35
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography features
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Street photography features
60
screen tilts
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616g)
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (226g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography highlights
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sports photography highlights
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (7 megapixels)
42
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
max fps low (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography highlights
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Travel photography highlights
50
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (7MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
65
lighter than average in class (226g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
missing Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography information
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Landscape photography information
45
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no image stabilization
low MP (7MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
41
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
missing Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging information
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Vlogging information
9
no video recording
31
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than average in class (226 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
 Olympus E-330Olympus SZ-16 iHS
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus SZ-16 iHS
Alternate name EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2006-03-18 2013-01-08
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Max resolution 3136 x 2352 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 pounds) 226 grams (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $1,100 $230