Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97313/9731330fcb04886d79572856af019d157e2f820f" alt="Olympus Stylus 7030 front Olympus Stylus 7030 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Replaced the Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Also referred to as mju 7030
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-330 and Olympus 7030, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and 7030 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and 7030 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-330 was manufactured 4 years before the 7030 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 7030 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-330 scores versus the 7030 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 and Olympus Stylus 7030. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus 7030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus 7030
E-330 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Olympus E-330
7030 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | March 2006 | Newer by 46 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus 7030
E-330 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 has outer measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus 7030 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-330 and Olympus 7030 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-330 compared to the 7030.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03341/03341fbad7ac6fd6cd098224c150406929a7d7ad" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and 7030 is 65 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c307d/c307d44325739868d6e6f44efeedf528fe0fc653" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and 7030.
Clearly, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus 7030 will give you extra detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3372/b3372ec74d9d95dca05d8a5db19e556f14fc7a00" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99705/9970557116be177b0e983277bcef36eb91a0823a" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7030 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus 7030 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus 7030 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-330 | mju 7030 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9 and 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lb) | 140 gr (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,100 | $179 |