Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6473/b6473b5865836cc6f780f02e1794663604ffc69e" alt="Olympus Stylus 7040 front Olympus Stylus 7040 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Previous Model is Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju 7040
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and 7040 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and 7040 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-330 was introduced 4 years earlier than the 7040 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 7040 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-330 matches up versus the 7040 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 and Olympus Stylus 7040. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus 7040 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus 7040
E-330 | 7040 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Olympus E-330
7040 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | March 2006 | More recent by 46 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus 7040
E-330 | 7040 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 provides physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7040 has specifications of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-330 versus the 7040.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/101d8/101d8399980359d721cf0e1546778854ae688882" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and 7040 is 65 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d1fe/4d1fe2a861b967650f830fac8dd1aa3670bb9fb1" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and 7040.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-330 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus 7040 will provide greater detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1751b/1751b3daea8256c9d1406426312920f2d728677a" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/229a2/229a23b303720221b28e4d6f782911619780a0e8" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus 7040 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus 7040 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | mju 7040 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 144g (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,100 | $299 |