Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus Stylus 7040 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
31
Overall
34

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-450
Olympus 7040
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju 7040
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Overview

Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and 7040 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and 7040 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-330 was introduced 4 years earlier than the 7040 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 7040 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-330 matches up versus the 7040 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus 7040

 E-330 7040 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Olympus E-330

 7040 E-330 
ReleasedJanuary 2010March 2006More recent by 46 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus 7040

 E-330 7040 
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 provides physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7040 has specifications of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-330 versus the 7040.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and 7040 is 65 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and 7040.

As you can see, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-330 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus 7040 will provide greater detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Olympus 7040
54
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (7MP)
28
good MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Olympus 7040
60
tilting screen
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616g)
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Olympus 7040
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
low fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (7MP)
39
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography details
Olympus 7040 Travel photography details
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
65
good MP (14MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Olympus 7040
45
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
missing Time Lapse mode
42
quite wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging information
Olympus 7040 Vlogging information
9
lack of video recording
29
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 7040 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus 7040
 Olympus E-330Olympus Stylus 7040
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus Stylus 7040
Also called as EVOLT E-330 mju 7040
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2006-03-18 2010-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-196mm (7.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range - 2cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 5.70 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lbs) 144g (0.32 lbs)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $1,100 $299