Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
42
Overall
41

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-450
Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Announced February 2015
  • Replacement is Olympus TG-870
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview

In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was revealed 10 years earlier than the TG-860 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-330 matches up against the TG-860 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus TG-860

 E-330 TG-860 
Manually focus Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-330

 TG-860 E-330 
AnnouncedFebruary 2015March 2006More recent by 108 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kCrisper screen (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-860

 E-330 TG-860 
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 has got physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 compared to the TG-860.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and TG-860 is 65 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The visual underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and TG-860.

Plainly, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-860 will give greater detail because of its extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-860 Portrait photography factors
54
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (7MP)
36
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Olympus TG-860
60
screen tilts
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average (616g)
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
69
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment proofing
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Olympus TG-860
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7MP)
49
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
features tracking focus
environment proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography details
Olympus TG-860 Travel photography details
50
lighter than average (616 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (7 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
environment proofing
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (21mm)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-860 Landscape photography highlights
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7MP)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
48
reasonably wide (21mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-860 Vlogging information
9
no video recording
33
reasonably wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
missing mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-860
 Olympus E-330Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860
Also called EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2006-03-18 2015-02-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3136 x 2352 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 21-105mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.7
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.00 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Yes
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lb) 224g (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $1,100 $279