Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-330 was introduced 10 years before the TG-870 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-330 scores against the TG-870 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus TG-870
E-330 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-330
TG-870 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | March 2006 | More recent by 119 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 215k | Crisper screen (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870
E-330 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 features external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-330 vs the TG-870.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and TG-870 is 65 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and TG-870.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-330 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-870 will result in more detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $1,100 | $280 |