Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
46
Overall
43

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-450
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
  • Released January 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.

Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

The E-330 was introduced 10 years before the TG-870 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-330 scores against the TG-870 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus TG-870

 E-330 TG-870 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-330

 TG-870 E-330 
ReleasedJanuary 2016March 2006More recent by 119 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k215kCrisper screen (+706k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870

 E-330 TG-870 
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 features external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-330 vs the TG-870.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and TG-870 is 65 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and TG-870.

As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-330 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-870 will result in more detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-870 Portrait photography highlights
54
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (7MP)
36
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography features
Olympus TG-870 Street photography features
60
tilting screen
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
65
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment proof
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than others in class (221g)
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-870 Sports photography features
40
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7 megapixels)
51
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery (300 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Olympus TG-870
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (7MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
69
better than average battery (300 shots)
environment proof
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (21mm)
heavier than others in class (221 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-870
45
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
50
reasonably wide (21mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment proof
better than average battery (300 shots)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-870 as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
32
reasonably wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external mic jack
heavier than others in class (221g)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870
 Olympus E-330Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870
Alternative name EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Introduced 2006-03-18 2016-01-06
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 21-105mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.7
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 4.00 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 gr (1.36 pounds) 221 gr (0.49 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $1,100 $280