Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-330 was introduced 10 years before the TG-870 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-330 scores against the TG-870 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus TG-870
| E-330 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-330
| TG-870 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 | March 2006 | More recent by 119 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 215k | Crisper screen (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870
| E-330 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 features external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-330 vs the TG-870.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and TG-870 is 65 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and TG-870.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-330 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-870 will result in more detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Alternative name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2016-01-06 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616 gr (1.36 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $1,100 | $280 |