Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
33
Overall
36

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-320, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was released 6 years before the TG-320 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-330 grades against the TG-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus TG-320

 E-330 TG-320 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-330

 TG-320 E-330 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012March 2006More recent by 70 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-320

 E-330 TG-320 
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 has got outer measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-330 vs the TG-320.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and TG-320 is 65 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and TG-320.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-330 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
54
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
34
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography information
Olympus TG-320 Street photography information
60
screen tilts
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than average (616g)
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competition (155g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
41
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography info
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography info
50
lighter than average (616 grams)
has built in flash
no Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
67
lighter than competition (155 grams)
weather sealing
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography advice
45
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
small screen (2.5 inches)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
no Timelapse function
39
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
terrible battery pack (150 shots)
missing Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging details
9
can't shoot video
32
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than competition (155g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-320
 Olympus E-330Olympus TG-320
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-330 Olympus TG-320
Also called EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2006-03-18 2012-01-10
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Max resolution 3136 x 2352 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 5.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lb) 155 grams (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Price at release $1,100 $0