Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus TG-630 iHS front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-450
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview

The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-330 was released 7 years before the TG-630 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-330 matches up vs the TG-630 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS

 E-330 TG-630 iHS 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-330

 TG-630 iHS E-330 
ReleasedJanuary 2013March 2006Newer by 82 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kClearer display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-630 iHS

 E-330 TG-630 iHS 
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 provides physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 against the TG-630 iHS.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and TG-630 iHS is 65 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and TG-630 iHS.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-630 iHS Portrait photography info
54
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low resolution sensor (7 megapixels)
27
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-630 iHS Street photography advice
60
screen tilts
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others (616 grams)
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Sports photography camera
40
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (7 megapixels)
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (220 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
50
lighter than others (616g)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (7MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
59
environment proofing
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
not so great battery pack (220 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
45
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (7MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Time Lapse function
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
not so great battery pack (220 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Olympus TG-630 iHS
9
lack of video recording
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone port
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
 Olympus E-330Olympus TG-630 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus TG-630 iHS
Other name EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Released 2006-03-18 2013-01-08
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3136 x 2352 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lb) 167 grams (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $1,100 $200