Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Also Known as EVOLT E-330
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-330 was announced 6 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-330 scores versus the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-330 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-330
TG-820 iHS | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | March 2006 | More modern by 71 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 215k | Clearer display (+815k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-330 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 has got exterior dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-330 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-330 compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and TG-820 iHS is 65 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-330 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will offer you greater detail with its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $1,100 | $500 |