Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus VG-110 front
Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Announced March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Announced February 2011
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and VG-110 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the VG-110 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting through a full comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-330 scores against the VG-110 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus VG-110

 E-330 VG-110 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-330

 VG-110 E-330 
AnnouncedFebruary 2011March 2006Fresher by 59 months
Display sizing2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VG-110

 E-330 VG-110 
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 has physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has specifications of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-330 compared to the VG-110.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and VG-110 is 65 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and VG-110.

As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus VG-110 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Portrait photography camera
54
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (7MP)
26
features face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography advice
Olympus VG-110 Street photography advice
60
tilting screen
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition (616g)
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography features
Olympus VG-110 Sports photography features
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7MP)
24
features tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (170 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than competition (616 grams)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (7MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
57
has built in flash
relatively wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
not so great battery (170 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography advice
45
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (7MP)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Timelapse mode
27
relatively wide (27mm)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
small screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
not so great battery (170 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Olympus VG-110
9
no video shooting
28
relatively wide (27mm)
features face detect autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus VG-110
 Olympus E-330Olympus VG-110
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus VG-110
Also called EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Announced 2006-03-18 2011-02-08
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 27-108mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 2.5" 2.7"
Display resolution 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 gr (1.36 pounds) 105 gr (0.23 pounds)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 170 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Price at launch $1,100 $150