Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VR-330, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-330 was released 5 years before the VR-330 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-330 grades vs the VR-330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus VR-330
E-330 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-330
VR-330 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | March 2006 | More modern by 59 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VR-330
E-330 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 has outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VR-330 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-330 versus the VR-330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39112/3911225b694a3f5ceb11d54f62c49e22f84a9c32" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and VR-330 is 65 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bb92/4bb9299440dfcd25415fba57bbf1b336ee1605a2" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and VR-330.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus VR-330 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfa7b/cfa7b0905c9c712e8c21e3464ed871f4653a1142" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28056/28056fda037f1afaa177f43fa1c5663062e0b8bc" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus VR-330 |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,100 | $220 |