Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
54 Imaging
79 Features
84 Overall
81
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1020g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Introduced February 2019
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and S1R (47MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and S1R (Full frame) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-330 was launched 14 years prior to the S1R which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic S1R being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-330 matches up vs the S1R in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Panasonic S1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic S1R
E-330 | S1R |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1R over the Olympus E-330
S1R | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2019 | March 2006 | Newer by 156 months | |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Screen resolution | 2100k | 215k | Clearer screen (+1885k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic S1R
E-330 | S1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 provides physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Panasonic S1R has measurements of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") and a weight of 1020 grams (2.25 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-330 compared to the S1R.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and S1R is 65 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and S1R.
Clearly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Panasonic S1R will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 40 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic S1R Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R |
Also called | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2019-02-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 47 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 8000 x 6000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 30 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3.2" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 2,100k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/320s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 1020g (2.25 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3525 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
Card slots | One | 2 |
Price at launch | $1,100 | $3,698 |