Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS200, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-330 was launched 13 years earlier than the ZS200 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-330 scores vs the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-330 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-330
ZS200 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | March 2006 | Newer by 145 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+1025k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS200
E-330 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 features physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 versus the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8094/e80940d0df66b9971501da53dd5c6db6b0fc1b9b" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and ZS200 is 65 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbb84/dbb8494c7350b1960a1e60d005b2375660b5f3cd" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The picture underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and ZS200.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/670e2/670e2c9d7da62aa234d1976accc7926007f62bb8" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfb4e/bfb4e9c79b294e938e87aa9185eaaf3fe7d41927" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lb) | 340 gr (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,100 | $800 |