Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS200, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-330 was launched 13 years earlier than the ZS200 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-330 scores vs the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-330 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-330
ZS200 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | March 2006 | Newer by 145 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 215k | Clearer display (+1025k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS200
E-330 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 features physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 versus the ZS200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and ZS200 is 65 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The picture underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and ZS200.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lb) | 340 gr (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,100 | $800 |