Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20 front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Announced March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Older Model is Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
Panasonic FH20
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 178g - 100 x 56 x 28mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS30
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 Overview

The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FH20 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FH20 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-330 was manufactured 4 years prior to the FH20 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH20 being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-330 scores against the FH20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic FH20

 E-330 FH20 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Panasonic FH20 over the Olympus E-330

 FH20 E-330 
ReleasedJanuary 2010March 2006Newer by 46 months
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FH20

 E-330 FH20 
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys exterior dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Panasonic FH20 has dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-330 compared to the FH20.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and FH20 is 65 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The pic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and FH20.

All in all, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FH20 will give you more detail due to its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography features
Panasonic FH20 Portrait photography features
54
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
28
MP count good (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography features
Panasonic FH20 Street photography features
60
tilting screen
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average (616 grams)
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Panasonic FH20
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
35
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14MP)
max fps low (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
Panasonic FH20 Travel photography features
50
lighter than average (616g)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
64
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FH20 Landscape photography factors
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
37
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Panasonic FH20
9
no video recording
28
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FH20 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FH20
 Olympus E-330Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH20
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 Lumix DMC-FS30
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2006-03-18 2010-01-06
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-224mm (8.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 5.80 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 lb) 178 grams (0.39 lb)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 100 x 56 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $1,100 $179