Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
44
Overall
39

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-450
Panasonic FX700
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
  • Released July 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 Overview

In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX700, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FX700 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FX700 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was announced 5 years prior to the FX700 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX700 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-330 grades vs the FX700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic FX700

 E-330 FX700 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus E-330

 FX700 E-330 
ReleasedJuly 2010March 2006Newer by 52 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX700

 E-330 FX700 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 has got physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX700 has specifications of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-330 against the FX700.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and FX700 is 65 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and FX700.

To sum up, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic FX700 will produce more detail with its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FX700 Portrait photography highlights
54
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low resolution (7MP)
38
focusing manually
MP count good (14MP)
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography information
Panasonic FX700 Street photography information
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (616g)
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography information
Panasonic FX700 Sports photography information
40
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (7MP)
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
Panasonic FX700 Travel photography features
50
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution (7 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
65
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FX700 as a Landscape photography camera
45
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (7 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
49
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.2)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Panasonic FX700
9
no video
33
fairly wide (24mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.2)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX700
 Olympus E-330Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2006-03-18 2010-07-21
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 7.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 pounds) 176 grams (0.39 pounds)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $1,100 $399