Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front
Portability
53
Imaging
53
Features
81
Overall
64

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Introduced March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-450
Panasonic FZ2500
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
  • Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview

The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") feature different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-330 was unveiled 11 years before the FZ2500 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-330 matches up versus the FZ2500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic FZ2500

 E-330 FZ2500 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-330

 FZ2500 E-330 
IntroducedSeptember 2016March 2006Newer by 127 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k215kSharper screen (+825k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FZ2500

 E-330 FZ2500 
Focus manually More precise focus

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 enjoys external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-330 versus the FZ2500.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and FZ2500 is 65 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and FZ2500.

To sum up, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will produce greater detail having an extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography details
Panasonic FZ2500 Portrait photography details
54
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
71
manual focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography features
Panasonic FZ2500 Street photography features
60
screen tilts
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (616g)
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
70
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
supports RAW files
includes focus via touch
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography features
Panasonic FZ2500 Sports photography features
40
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
69
incredible zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
offers tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography information
Panasonic FZ2500 Travel photography information
50
lighter than competitors in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
66
includes focus via touch
decent megapixels (20MP)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (480mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography information
Panasonic FZ2500 Landscape photography information
45
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
65
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
supports RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging info
Panasonic FZ2500 Vlogging info
9
can't record video
66
rather wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has microphone port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FZ2500
 Olympus E-330Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 Lumix DMC-FZ2000
Type Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2006-03-18 2016-09-19
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 400 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Lowest enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 215k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Max silent shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 12.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 13.20 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution None 4096x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lbs) 915g (2.02 lbs)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life - 350 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - DMW-BLC12
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $1,100 $998