Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Old Model is Olympus E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") feature different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-330 was unveiled 11 years before the FZ2500 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-330 matches up versus the FZ2500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-330 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-330
FZ2500 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | March 2006 | Newer by 127 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Sharper screen (+825k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-330 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 enjoys external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-330 versus the FZ2500.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and FZ2500 is 65 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and FZ2500.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will produce greater detail having an extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 915g (2.02 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $1,100 | $998 |